Public Education Forum a NAFO Initiative

Petitio principii

Search for glossary terms (regular expression allowed)
Term Definition

Petitio principii

Petition principii, or begging the question, is a logical fallacy where a claim is supported by a premise that either restates the claim or assumes it to be true. Essentially, it tries to prove a proposition by taking the proposition for granted.

When this fallacy involves only one variable, it is sometimes called hysteron proteron (Greek for 'later earlier'), a rhetorical device. An example is the statement:

'Opium induces sleep because it has a soporific quality.'

The word 'soporific' means 'causing sleep,' so the phrase doesn't actually explain why opium causes sleep. A sentence that properly explains why opium induces sleep might be:

'Opium induces sleep because it contains Morphine-6-glucuronide, which inhibits the brain's pain receptors, causing a pleasurable sensation that eventually leads to sleep.'

This fallacy can occur in a simple statement or through a more complex series of statements that circle back to the original claim, thus 'proving' it without providing any actual evidence.

Synonyms: begging the question, petitio quæsiti, hysteron proteron

NAFO Public Education Forum

The purpose of NAFO-PEF is to engage in identifying and analyzing disinformation, formulating defensive strategies, and crafting proactive measures to counter and minimize its impact.

To support our efforts, you can check out our merchandise available on Buy Me a Coffee and our Bonfire Store. Every purchase directly helps fund the forum’s activities and our ongoing fight against disinformation.