Nigel Farage

Farage’s Role in Brexit and Russian Ties

Nigel Farage, Reform UK’s Honorary President and unofficial figurehead, has long been scrutinized for his links to Russia.

As the leader of UKIP and later a prominent Brexit advocate, Farage frequently appeared on Russia Today (RT), a state-funded Russian news outlet widely regarded as a tool for Kremlin propaganda.

  • RT Appearances: Farage was interviewed multiple times by RT during the Brexit campaign, where he often praised Vladimir Putin and Russia’s leadership style. In one interview, Farage said he "admired" Putin’s ability to get things done, describing him as the "world leader I most admire." These comments were not isolated; they aligned with a broader trend of Farage’s rhetoric presenting Russia as a counterbalance to what he perceived as overreach by the EU and NATO.
  • Mueller Report and Brexit: Farage’s connections to Russian interference gained additional scrutiny during investigations into the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. The Mueller Report highlighted Farage’s close relationship with Steve Bannon and his role as a link between Russian operatives and the Trump campaign. Farage’s proximity to Julian Assange and Wikileaks during the campaign also raised questions about his involvement in spreading hacked Democratic emails.

Alignment with Kremlin Narratives

Farage’s messaging often mirrors Russian disinformation themes, including anti-EU, anti-NATO, and anti-globalism rhetoric.

His consistent attacks on Western institutions have been beneficial to Moscow’s strategic goals of weakening European unity and trust in democratic institutions.

For example, Farage’s staunch opposition to sanctions on Russia following the annexation of Crimea echoed Kremlin arguments about Western overreach.

Chris Harborne (aka Chakrit Sakunkrit)

Wealth and Russian Connections

Chris Harborne, Reform UK’s largest donor, has a shadowy financial background that includes dealings in aviation fuel and cryptocurrency—both industries known for Russian involvement.

  • Panama Papers: Harborne appeared in the Panama Papers under his Thai alias, Chakrit Sakunkrit, linked to offshore accounts that facilitate opaque financial transactions. This dual identity raises questions about his financial dealings and potential ties to Russian oligarchs or networks. Offshore accounts often serve as vehicles for laundering funds, a practice associated with Russian-linked entities.
  • Cryptocurrency and Tether: In March 2023, reports revealed Harborne’s role in helping the crypto operator Tether circumvent U.S. banking restrictions. Tether has been criticized for its lack of transparency and alleged connections to money laundering, including funds originating in Russia. Harborne’s involvement in cryptocurrency raises broader questions about how such networks may intersect with Russian financial influence.

Aviation Fuel and Russian Links

Harborne’s fortune from aviation fuel trading also intersects with Russia’s dominant role in global energy markets.

His business dealings through AML Global and Sherriff Global Group may have indirectly connected him to Russian energy networks.

Given Russia’s reliance on energy exports for geopolitical leverage, any involvement in this sector warrants further investigation.

Jeremy Hosking

Financing Far-Right Movements

Jeremy Hosking, another major donor to Reform UK, has a history of bankrolling Brexit-related parties and campaigns that align with Kremlin disinformation narratives.

  • Specific Contributions: Hosking has donated over £2.5 million to Reform UK, and additional millions to pro-Brexit campaigns, such as Leave.EU and Vote Leave, both of which have faced accusations of benefiting from Russian-backed narratives. Leave.EU, in particular, has been scrutinized for its data-sharing practices and alleged connections to Cambridge Analytica, a firm investigated for its Russian ties.
  • Anti-EU Rhetoric: Hosking’s public statements consistently criticize the European Union as a failing institution, a view that mirrors Moscow’s strategic goal of undermining European unity. In interviews, Hosking has referred to the EU as an “undemocratic superstate”—language frequently employed in Kremlin propaganda.
  • Financial Transparency Concerns: Hosking’s opaque financial dealings through his investment firm, Hosking Partners, have drawn scrutiny. While there is no direct evidence of Russian ties, his investments often align with interests that benefit from destabilizing Western institutions.
  • Indirect Influence: Reports have noted that some of the narratives amplified by Brexit campaigns funded by Hosking—such as fears about immigration and cultural erosion—closely align with themes frequently promoted by Russian state media outlets, including RT and Sputnik.

George Farmer

From Hedge Funds to Far-Right Platforms

George Farmer, a former hedge funder and ex-CEO of the far-right social media platform Parler, also has indirect connections to Russian interests.

  • Parler and Russian Servers: Parler’s reliance on Russian-owned servers for hosting its platform raised concerns about potential data exposure and alignment with Kremlin-supported disinformation. Critics argue that Parler’s infrastructure decisions made it vulnerable to exploitation by foreign actors. This decision reflects broader trends in far-right media relying on permissive jurisdictions to operate.
  • Turning Point UK: As a co-founder of Turning Point UK, Farmer has promoted anti-climate change and anti-globalist rhetoric. These narratives often align with Russian efforts to weaken Western climate initiatives and international cooperation. For example, Turning Point UK frequently frames climate policies as economically destructive, echoing Kremlin-sponsored narratives aimed at fostering divisions among Western nations.
  • Family Connections and Ideological Ties: Farmer’s marriage to U.S. political commentator Candace Owens underscores his proximity to networks that amplify Russian-aligned narratives. Owens is known for controversial remarks undermining Western alliances, and her platform frequently pushes themes aligning with populist and nationalist ideologies favored by the Kremlin.

Media Ecosystem Backing Reform UK

GB News and Billionaire Funders

GB News, a major platform for Reform UK figures, has been funded by individuals with questionable ties to Russian-linked industries.

  • Christopher Chandler: Founder of Legatum, a Dubai-based investment firm that heavily funds GB News. Chandler made his fortune in Russian gas markets during the 1990s and has faced allegations of improper dealings. While Chandler denies any wrongdoing, his financial history raises questions about his broader influence on media narratives.
  • Paul Marshall: Another GB News backer, Marshall’s investments in media amplify Reform UK’s messaging, often overlapping with Kremlin propaganda themes such as anti-EU and anti-immigration narratives.

Overlap with Russian Disinformation

The editorial slant of GB News frequently aligns with Russian disinformation campaigns, including its focus on divisive cultural issues, skepticism of climate science, and hostility toward immigration.

For instance, its frequent coverage of "small boats" and immigration crises mirrors talking points amplified by Russian media to destabilize European unity.

Patterns in Reform UK’s Operations

Narrative Alignment

Reform UK’s key messaging often mirrors Russian disinformation themes:

  • Anti-Globalism: Persistent criticism of "globalist" policies mirrors Kremlin narratives targeting Western unity. Reform UK leaders frequently frame global cooperation efforts as threats to national sovereignty.
  • Distrust in Institutions: Reform UK’s focus on immigration and border control reinforces narratives aimed at stoking division and mistrust in government and international bodies like the UN and the EU.

Social Media and Bot Activity

Reform UK’s amplified presence on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) reflects tactics consistent with coordinated disinformation campaigns.

While no direct evidence links Reform UK to bot activity, the rapid amplification of its content suggests a sophisticated media strategy that may overlap with known disinformation techniques.

Patterns of coordinated posting and echoing of divisive themes bear striking similarities to tactics used by Russian troll farms.

Conclusion

While definitive evidence of direct Russian control or influence over Reform UK and its backers remains elusive, the parallels between their narratives and Kremlin disinformation campaigns are undeniable.

By pushing anti-immigration, anti-globalist, and climate-skeptic narratives, Reform UK undermines public trust in democratic institutions while promoting division.

The involvement of wealthy individuals with opaque financial dealings and ties to industries linked to Russian interests exacerbates the erosion of transparency and accountability.

For the very voters Reform UK claims to represent, these actions have a tangible cost.

Policies influenced by such narratives often result in weakened protections for vulnerable communities, reduced international cooperation, and a growing divide between citizens and their governing institutions.

Disinformation not only distorts public debate but also shifts attention away from addressing genuine societal challenges.

By understanding and exposing these connections, there is a greater opportunity to safeguard democratic values and rebuild trust in the political system.

Sources