Figure. The pages of Estonian Auditor General Karl Soonpää's diary, now preserved in the Estonian Museum of History. Author/source: Museum of History

Six Months from Sovereign, Constitutional States to Incorporation Inside of the USSR Totalitarian Structure

How did the transformation occur so quickly? 

I argue that Sovietization initially depended less on replacing institutions than on capturing and redirecting the existing constitutional machinery of government. The administrative machinery remained largely intact for the first two months while the source of political authority radically shifted and the USSR redirected the existing constitutional machinery to dismantle the states from within. 

---

Support Independent Baltic Historical Research!

This article is part of The Journey of the Baltic Gold series, an ongoing investigation based on archival documents, historical records, and contemporary sources. If you value carefully researched, freely accessible work on Baltic history and security, you can support future research through Buy Me a Coffee.

☕ Support this research

---

Sovereignty Slips Away

--------------

From the Diary of the Auditor General: Karl Soonpää

11 June 1940 

ENG: "Went to 'Centum' [bridge club]. Talts, Lorenz, Braun (10–11 o'clock) (+26X40).”[1]

12 June 1940

ENG: "Regarding the Moscow negotiations of Lithuania's prime minister and foreign minister (Merkys and Urbšys, summoned to Moscow a few days ago), word is that Russia's demands don't diverge much from the pact." [1]

16 June 1940

ENG: "At the Sikkaris' place, in Visuste village... Everyone was in very good spirits. Lots of singing and laughing. Drove back to Tallinn with the Kösters. Needed petrol in Järva-Jaani. When it came out who was in the car, the local constable told Kaasik that Russian troops are being brought into Tallinn and other Estonian cities... I refused to believe it in any way... We got home at 2am. I rang Meil and Ahven — no answer. Finally Kelder answered, that the news is true - except for the troop numbers. He sounds shaken." [2]

17 June 1940

ENG "Finally it's stated that an analogous note has also been presented to Estonia, and the Estonian government has accepted it and resigned from office." [2]

Figure. Soviet Navy sailors (Red Navy / Voyenno-Morskoy Flot, VMF) march through Riga during the Soviet Occupation of Latvia, June 1940. Screenshot by the author from Film Director, Albert Jekste’s My Latvia (documentary film, presented by the United States Information Service), 06:00 Internet Archive. [4]

21 June 1940

ENG: "The Russians are bringing in new forces: 2 corps- 5 divisions, together with 200 tanks... To secure communications, Russian representatives are placed in the most important telephone exchanges, and commandants at the railway junction stations." [3]

21 June 1940

ENG: "At 10pm the cabinet meets again. General Laidoner reports on his trip to Narva, where he met General Meretskov. Meretskov had brought the text of the agreement with him from Moscow, and over six hours of argument he wasn't able to change or amend a single word of it... The Home Guard's weapons are to be taken away. Laidoner: could the Home Guard really be seen as any kind of threat to Russian armored cars and tanks? Meretskov: of course not- but the Russian soldier can't understand how an Estonian peasant gets to carry a rifle, when the Russian one can't.” [3]

-----

The Soviet Union’s Occupation of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania is often described as a rapid military conquest. Much more surprising is the six-month, deep transformation with which three sovereign, constitutional nations were transformed into totalitarian, Soviet republics. In the Administrative Liquidation graphic, we see that by December 1940, the USSR was summing up the costs of liquidating Estonia’s worldwide diplomatic representation.

The First Days Set the Stage

 

Figure. A portion of the article "Baltic Countries Enter Red Union," Wilmington Daily Star, July 22, 1940, page 3. [5] [6]

The Occupation proceeded like a theatre, which could play out as a satirical comedy, if the situation weren’t so deadly serious. The first days of USSR’s full Occupation of the Baltic countries, show a consistent playbook: Bring large numbers of Soviet troops that illegally exceeded, again, the number of troops permitted in the 1939 Mutual Assistance Pacts between each of the Baltic countries and the USSR, a parade fanfare with music, a staged mob with planted nonlocal civilians expressing unhappiness with the Baltic countries and solidarity with Stalin, and release of so-called ‘political’ prisoners from jail, who were later utilized in the USSR’s new security apparatus in the Baltic countries. The local Baltic photographers and filmmakers captured these scenes. See the Tallinn photos attached to the ERR article about Karl Soonpää’s diary 22 June 1940 [[22]], the similar scenes captured by filmmaker Jekste [4] in Riga and the photos in the Exhibits in the back section of the US Congress Kersten Committee Report number 1 on the Baltic countries. [15]

Some contemporary American newspapers reported the orchestrated public spectacle accompanying the Soviet annexation, as well. Reporting on the Latvian parliament's vote to join the USSR, The Wilmington Morning Star July 22, 1940 described "tremendous shouts" in response to petitions for union with Russia, deputies repeatedly crying "No! No!" after the Communist Party secretary asked whether anyone opposed annexation, and the session ending with chants of "Soviet Latvia forever" and "Long live Stalin." The newspaper noted that the proceedings in Kaunas and Tallinn were almost identical, illustrating the staged and coordinated nature of the Soviet takeover. [5] Many more instances of contemporary news highlighting these staged scenes can by seen in Jens Walter’s OTD news posted to X-Twitter with hashtag Hitler-Stalin-Pact. [6]

The staged mob scenes and released ‘political prisoners’ helped to feed the narrative that the USSR came to the Baltic countries’ assistance at their request with their ‘socialist revolutions’, providing an endless well of propaganda material. One example of the breadth of the propaganda for Occupied Latvians can be seen two decades later, in 1963 in Riga, in a high-impact method which utilized the Latvian Academy of Sciences. This 544 page ‘scholarly’ book portrayed the 1940 Soviet Occupation of Latvia as a Revolution." [12]

 

Figure. December 1940. Administrative dismantling of Estonia's Foreign Ministry during the Soviet takeover, 1940/41. Cover page and selected pages from the Estonian State Control (Riigikontroll) audit of the 1940/1941 Foreign Representations Budget (Välisesindused. 1940/1941.a. eelarve). The budget lists the operating costs of Estonia's diplomatic missions, including London, Paris, Stockholm, Helsinki, Moscow, New York, Geneva, Riga, and other foreign representations, while documenting the financial administration associated with liquidating the Republic of Estonia's overseas diplomatic service following the Soviet Occupation and annexation in 1940. Together, these records illustrate how the existing administrative machinery of the Estonian state was employed to implement the liquidation of its own sovereign institutions. Sources: Estonian State Archives (Rahvusarhiiv), ERA.957.15.3, images 319–322.  [11]

Repurposing the Functioning Machinery- the National Auditors

With such a theatrical beginning, how did such a Totalitarian transformation happen so quickly? The numbers for a direct substitution don’t add up. There were too few Communists for a direct replacement of the working governments of the Baltic countries. Up to the start of USSR’s June 1940 Occupation, the number of Communist Party members in the three Baltic Countries was approximately 1600 (Lithuania), 1000 (Latvia), and 150 (Estonia). [7] The number of state administration / civil service was approximately 25,000 in Lithuania [8], >40,000 in Latvia [9], and >29,000 in Estonia [10]. The transformation was not a substitute and replace.

The key government agency co-opted to facilitate the Soviet transformation was the National Auditors. By examining the Baltic State Control institutions in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, this article traces how constitutional institutions were retained, redirected, actively utilized, and then the institution was absorbed into the Soviet administrative system when their tasks were finished. Such speed was possible because the USSR captured and redirected the existing constitutional machinery to dismantle the states from within.

The national auditors were not ordinary civil servants. In Latvia, the Valsts kontrole is, and was, constitutionally independent, with a status comparable to the judiciary. The Latvian Constitution (Satversme) and the 1923 Law on State Control established it as an independent collegiate institution whose task was to audit state property, ensure legality, efficiency, and propriety in the use of public funds, and report to the Saeima. Members of the Latvian Constitutional Assembly repeatedly argued that State Control must not become subordinate to either Parliament or the Government, because then it would lose the independence necessary to supervise public finances objectively. Speakers explicitly compared auditors with judges. [13]

According to Zarina, the other two Baltic audit institutions: Valstybės kontrolė (Lithuania) and Riigikontroll (Estonia) are, and were similar. After later-June 1940, until late August1940, when they were absorbed into the People's Commissariats of State Control, subordinate to Moscow [14], the three institutions were no longer supervising government independently, and instead, implementing Soviet economic policy. The USSR had essentially appropriated one of the constitutional guardians of three democratic states.

As the national auditors’ fulfilled the role of appearing as a legal independent, it was their expertise and knowledge that explained why they were co-opted. The Soviet authorities did not possess detailed knowledge of every ministry, every bank, every state enterprise, every accounting system, every inventory. It was the existing Baltic audit institutions that already possessed that institutional knowledge. The national auditing institutions were valuable because they produced multiple forms of actionable knowledge that supported the broader Occupation and Sovietization process.

For example, the Republic of Estonia entered the Soviet occupation with a highly developed administrative and financial system, where we can see the 1939/40 state budget lists with detailed appropriations for every ministry, agency, state enterprise, railway, communications system, police administration, and statistical office. Soviet 'national auditors' therefore did not enter an administrative vacuum; rather, they overlaid an extensive inspection network onto an already well-documented state bureaucracy. [25] Their task was the rapid identification of strategic assets, production capacity, and politically reliable personnel. Therefore, the national auditors possessed exactly the skills and knowledge that an occupying power would immediately need. 

The co-opting of the National Auditing institutions was surgical. From the Military Occupation and the political command by the Kremlin emissaries, Puppet governments were installed by the Kremlin emissaries within six days. The former, independent constitutional Auditor Generals were first displaced from office, then, in most cases, physically removed from society through deportation, imprisonment, or death, while Soviet-appointed successors continued operating within the same constitutional institutions until the institutions were formally transformed into People's Commissariats six weeks later.

The Soviet Takeover Threaded Sequence:

• 15–17 Jun 1940

  • Military Occupation (Lithuania 15 Jun; Latvia and Estonia 17 Jun).

• 15–21 Jun 1940

  • Moscow emissaries assume political control (Dekanozov, Vyshinsky, Zhdanov, for LT, LV, EE).

• 17–21 Jun 1940

  • People's (puppet) governments installed (Paleckis, Kirhenšteins, Vares).

• Late Jun–13 Jul 1940

  • Capture of constitutional institutions.

• Jul–Aug 1940

  • Occupation administration consolidates control over ministries and state administration.

• 22–26 Jul 1940

  • Nationalization of banks and major enterprises.

• Late Jul–Aug 1940

  • Economic takeover expands across the Baltic States.

• Aug 1940

  • Soviet administrative system replaces independent state administration.

• 25–26 Aug 1940

  • Constitutional audit institutions replaced by People's Commissariats of State Control.

produced multiple forms of administrative knowledge during the Soviet Occupation from its first days. The national auditors were an immediate target. It took less than six days to install a Soviet-controlled government, which could co-opt the national auditors. 

Soviet Capture of the Baltic Audit Institutions (1940)

Country	Occupation	Soviet-controlled government	Last independent head replaced	Soviet-appointed successor	People's Commissariat established
Lithuania	15 Jun 1940	17 Jun – Justas Paleckis (People's Government)	Kazys (Konstantinas) Šakenis	Liudas Adomauskas, Valstybės kontrolierius (State Controller)	25 Aug 1940 – People's Commissariat of State Control
Latvia	17 Jun 1940	21 Jun – Augusts Kirhenšteins (People's Government)	Kārlis Piegāze	Arnolds Tabaks, Valsts kontrolieris (State Controller)	Late Aug 1940 – People's Commissariat of State Control
Estonia	17 Jun 1940	21 Jun – Johannes Vares (People's Government)	Karl Johannes Soonpää	Aleksander Aben, Acting Auditor General (Riigikontrolöri ajutine kohusetäitja)	25 Aug 1940 – People's Commissariat of State Control

The Soviet Takeover phases provided a surgical methodology for the USSR to quickly achieve the capture, reorganization, and consolidation of Soviet authority. 

• Political capture

• Institutional capture

• Personnel filtration

• Institutional intelligence

• Economic intelligence

• Administrative due diligence

• Political enforcement

• Administrative dismantling

• Institutional Sovietization

 

The data from the national auditors provided a rich set of data for the USSR’s Baltic Occupation.

Intelligence Type Primary Question Answered

• Institutional How does the state work?

• Economic How does the economy work?

• Fiscal Where is the state's money?

• Personnel Who runs the institutions?

• Asset What property exists and who owns it?

• Institutional security Which officials can be trusted?

• Narrative construction How can the previous regime be discredited?

• Political enforcement Which documented findings can support coercive action?

• Administrative surveillance Is the new Soviet system functioning as directed?

 

1. Institutional intelligence: Knowledge about how ministries, agencies, municipalities, and public institutions were organized, staffed, financed, and connected administratively, enabling their subsequent reorganization or replacement.

2. Economic intelligence: Knowledge about the productive economy, including enterprises, banks, cooperatives, industrial capacity, inventories, liabilities, production, and financial condition, supporting nationalization and central planning.

3. Personnel intelligence: Knowledge about the individuals who operated the state and economy, including employee lists, organizational hierarchies, appointments, transfers, dismissals, technical expertise, and positions of responsibility, facilitating leadership replacement and political vetting.

4. Fiscal intelligence: Knowledge about the financial resources of the state, including government accounts, ministry budgets, presidential funds, public expenditures, revenues, obligations, and discretionary accounts, enabling the Soviet authorities to assume control over public finances and retrospectively examine the fiscal practices of the former governments. Typical documentary products: Government accounts, Ministry budgets, Presidential funds, Budget execution reports, Public expenditure records, Treasury balances.

Additional categories

5. Asset intelligence: Knowledge identifying the ownership, location, quantity, condition, and legal status of state and private assets—including buildings, equipment, inventories, bank accounts, securities, and other property—required for confiscation, transfer, and incorporation into the Soviet economy. Typical documentary products: Inventories, Balance sheets, Acceptance and transfer acts, Property registers, Asset valuations.

6. Institutional security: Knowledge used to assess the political reliability and administrative trustworthiness of personnel within the audit institutions and other state bodies, supporting the retention, reassignment, or removal of officials during the Sovietization process. Typical documentary products: Personnel files, Staffing lists, Appointment and dismissal orders, Transfers, Organizational charts, Nomenklatura records

7. Narrative construction: Knowledge derived from retrospective audits of ministries, presidential institutions, budgets, and public finances that could be used to portray the previous governments as financially irresponsible, corrupt, inefficient, or illegitimate, thereby supporting Soviet political narratives. Typical documentary products: Audits of former ministries, Presidential fund examinations Historical budget reviews, Financial investigations of previous administrations, Reports highlighting alleged irregularities

8. Political enforcement: Knowledge transferred from audit institutions to Party authorities, prosecutors, and other state organs that identified individuals, quantified alleged losses or irregularities, and documented administrative actions capable of supporting disciplinary measures, prosecutions, or other coercive state actions. Typical documentary products: Audit reports, Prosecutor referrals, Investigation files, Revision acts, Documentary evidence supporting legal proceedings. Notice that this definition does not say the auditors themselves arrested people. It says they produced documentary evidence that could support enforcement by other Soviet institutions.

9. Administrative surveillance: Knowledge generated through continuing audits of production, labour, taxation, public expenditure, and state planning that enabled Soviet authorities to monitor compliance with economic directives, evaluate institutional performance, and supervise implementation of the centrally planned economy. Typical documentary products: Production reports, Wage and labour records, Taxation reviews, Plan fulfillment reports, Administrative expenditure audits, Compliance reports

 

Let’s see the step-by-step takeover sequence, expanded, from the Point-of-View of the Auditors.

Reconstructed Sequence of the Soviet Capture and Repurposing of the Baltic Audit Institutions (June–August 1940)

Approx. Date	Soviet Takeover Sequence	Documented Activity	Interpretation
15–17 Jun 1940	Military Occupation (Lithuania 15 Jun; Latvia and Estonia 17 Jun).	Constitutional audit institutions remain in place. (a,b,f,g,h)	Military control precedes institutional transformation.
15–21 Jun 1940	Moscow emissaries assume political control (Dekanozov, Vyshinsky, Zhdanov).	Audit institutions continue operating under independent leadership. (a,c,d,e,f,g,h)	Political control established before institutional capture.
17–21 Jun 1940	People's (puppet) governments installed (Paleckis, Kirhenšteins, Vares).	Constitutional audit institutions remain formally unchanged while the new governments consolidate control. (c, d,e,f, g,, h)	Constitutional continuity temporarily preserved.
Late Jun–13 Jul 1940	Capture of constitutional institutions begins.	Independent heads of State Control replaced (Šakenis → Adomauskas; Piegāze → Tabaks; Soonpää → Aben). (c, d,e, i)	Institutional capture.
Jul–Aug 1940	Occupation administration consolidates control over ministries and state administration.	Audit institutions continue operating under Soviet leadership, surveying ministries, examining accounts, reviewing personnel, and reporting on administrative structures. (c,d,e)	Administrative continuity under new political control; institutional and personnel intelligence.
22–26 Jul 1940	Nationalization of banks and major enterprises.	Auditors document assets, liabilities, inventories, and financial condition to support transfer of ownership. (c,d)	Administrative due diligence for nationalization; economic intelligence.
Late Jul–Aug 1940	Economic takeover expands across the Baltic States.	Audit staff participate in Nationalization Commissions, inventories, transfer acts, and acceptance documentation. (c,d,e)	Asset intelligence and transfer administration.
Aug 1940	Soviet administrative system replaces independent state administration.	Audit work expands into confiscation, personnel reviews, reporting to Soviet authorities, and referrals to prosecutors. (c,d,e)	Political enforcement; administrative dismantling; retrospective delegitimization of the former state.
25–26 Aug 1940	Constitutional audit institutions replaced by People's Commissariats of State Control.	Constitutional audit institutions abolished and replaced by People's Commissariats of State Control. (c,d,e)	Institutional Sovietization completed.

Sources: (a) U.S. Congress, Kersten Committee, Baltic States Investigation, First Interim Report (1954). [15] (b) Constitutional continuity reconstructed from the Lithuanian, Latvian, and Estonian State Control histories and archival records documenting the continued operation of the constitutional audit institutions during the transition from independent governments to Soviet-controlled People's Governments. [17] [18] [16] (c) Lietuvos valstybės kontrolės istorija (2015), ch. IV. [16] (d) Latvian State Historical Archive (LVVA), Fond 992, invs. US1a, US2a. [17] (e) National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), fonds ERA.R-941 (invs. 1.1, 1.14, 1.30) and ERA.957 (inv. 15.3). [18] (f) Karl Soonpää, diary entry, 16 June 1940, ERR, 2020. [19] (g) Karl Soonpää, diary entry, 17 June 1940, ERR, 2020. [20] (h) Karl Soonpää, diary entry, 21 June 1940, ERR, 2020. [21] (i) Karl Soonpää, diary entry, 22 June 1940, ERR, 2020. [22]

 

Now let’s see the step-by-step takeover sequence, expanded, from the Utilitarian Point-of-View of the Soviet Occupiers.

Administrative Knowledge Produced by the Baltic Audit Institutions and Its Role in Soviet State Consolidation (1940–1941)

Soviet Takeover Objective	Documented Audit Activity	Information Produced	Later Soviet Use	Interpretation
Capture state administration	Audit ministries, agencies, and public institutions	Organizational structures, reporting chains, budgets, responsibilities	Reorganization of ministries, abolition or merger of institutions, creation of Soviet administrative structures	Institutional intelligence
Nationalize the economy	Audit enterprises, banks, cooperatives, and commercial organizations	Assets, liabilities, inventories, production capacity, debts, contracts	Nationalization, transfer of ownership, central planning, allocation to trusts and commissariats	Economic intelligence
Capture state finances	Audit government accounts, presidential funds, ministry budgets, and public finances	Financial records, expenditure patterns, discretionary funds, obligations	State asset transfer, budget restructuring, retrospective examination of previous governments	Fiscal intelligence
Restructure personnel	Review staffing, appointments, transfers, salaries, organizational charts, nomenklatura matters	Employee lists, managerial hierarchies, technical expertise, key officials	Replacement of leadership, retention of selected specialists, political vetting, staffing of Soviet institutions	Personnel intelligence
Transfer property to the Soviet state	Prepare inventories, balance sheets, acceptance acts, transfer documentation, liquidation records	Verified ownership, physical assets, equipment, buildings, records	Confiscation, transfer to People's Commissariats, liquidation of constitutional institutions	Asset intelligence
Control political reliability	Internal personnel reviews, appointments, dismissals, transfers, reassignment of unfinished work	Political reliability of audit staff and administrative personnel	Screening of trusted officials before assignment to sensitive nationalization and inspection work	Institutional security
Investigate the previous state	Audit presidential offices, ministries, former government funds, earlier budgets, pre-occupation accounts	Administrative decisions, financial practices, named officials, documentary evidence	Retrospective criticism of the previous governments; propaganda supporting Soviet legitimacy	Narrative construction
Enforce Soviet authority	Refer audit findings to commissariats, Party authorities, and prosecutors	Named individuals, alleged financial irregularities, quantified losses, documentary evidence	Administrative sanctions, criminal investigations, arrests, prosecutions, disciplinary action	Political enforcement
Support long-term Soviet governance	Continue auditing production, labour, taxation, state plans, profitability, and administrative expenditure	Economic performance, compliance, production statistics, implementation of Soviet policy	Monitoring implementation of the planned economy and enforcement of state directives	Administrative surveillance

 

National Auditors as Indispensable Participants

The national auditors were indispensable participants in the legal and administrative process that transformed confiscation into officially recognized Soviet state ownership.

After institutional capture by the USSR of the national auditors in the last week of June 1940, the archival evidence demonstrates that some members of the Baltic constitutional audit institutions participated directly in the administrative implementation of Soviet nationalization. In Lithuania, State Control was incorporated into the Soviet nationalization machinery through Nationalization Commissions and its subsequent transformation into the Lithuanian SSR People's Commissariat of State Control. [16]

Latvian archival records provide even stronger operational evidence. Some State Control auditors personally travelled to enterprises and repositories of confiscated property, documented, inventoried, verified, and valued assets, and signed inventories, acceptance-and-transfer acts, and other official records transferring confiscated property into Soviet ownership. The surviving records identify individual State Control auditors, including R. Zvērs, V. Šteinbergs, and A. Junge, as participants in these procedures, alongside Finance Ministry commission members and bank staff, demonstrating that State Control officials were not merely reviewing completed transactions but were directly involved in the documentary execution of confiscation. [23]

The surviving evidence does not always identify whether State Control officials themselves physically entered every enterprise or repository at the moment of seizure. Nevertheless, the documentary record demonstrates that they were indispensable participants in the legal and administrative process that transformed confiscation into officially recognized Soviet state ownership through inventories, valuations, verification, and transfer documentation. This pattern is corroborated by the Latvian enterprise audit records and by the Estonian records documenting institutional continuity, liquidation commissions, and transfer acts during the dismantling of constitutional institutions. [18]

Now that you know the critical role of the national auditors in the transformation of the Baltic countries into totalitarian PSR structures, you might guess the fate of the last independent heads of the national auditors. 

Fate of the Last Independent Baltic Heads of State Control

Country	Last independent head	Removed from office	Subsequent fate
Lithuania	Kazys (Konstantinas) Šakenis	June 1940	Arrested during the mass deportations of 14 June 1941, imprisoned in Kraslag, later exiled in Tomsk Oblast. Returned to Lithuania in 1956 and died on 7 July 1959.
Latvia	Kārlis Piegāze	Before 5 July 1940	Arrested and deported on 14 June 1941 to Usollag (Perm/Molotov Oblast), where he died in custody on 23 October 1941.
Estonia	Karl Johannes Soonpää	10 July 1940	Officially released "at his own request." 22 June 1940 for a prearranged holiday that he never returned from. In June 1941, Soonpää escaped the first wave of deportations by going into hiding in the forests. He was killed by Soviet partisans near Elva on 15 June 1944 during the Soviet reoccupation of Estonia.

Practical Trust Testing Before the Formal Anketa

How did the Kremlin determine which national auditor could be trusted? The Communist Party did not dominate Baltic society in the beginning of the Occupation, and it was too early to administer the USSR’s well-established anketa questionnaires which the USSR used to historically vet each citizen. The archival record suggests that the Soviet authorities had already begun assessing the political reliability of audit personnel through their day-to-day assignments during the earliest days and weeks of the Occupation.

Rather than relying initially on written declarations of political background, the Occupation authorities assigned State Control officials to politically sensitive tasks associated with Sovietization itself. These included participation in the inventory and valuation of nationalized enterprises, inspection of bank safe-deposit boxes, preparation of inventories of confiscated property, verification of financial records, and execution of acceptance-and-transfer documentation. Such assignments required more than accounting expertise, the tasked required a demonstrated willingness, whether it was authentic, or not, to implement Soviet confiscation policy. These tasks served as a filter.

Auditors who efficiently carried out politically sensitive assignments, demonstrated administrative competence and political compliance simultaneously. Those who resisted, delayed, or refused such work would have revealed themselves long before completing the Fall 1940 anketa questionnaire. Therefore, the early months of Soviet Occupation functioned as an informal probationary period during which professional performance became an immediate indicator of political reliability.

By the time in the Fall of 1940, when auditor officials completed detailed anketa questionnaires, many auditors had already been observed in practice implementing one of the Occupation regime's most politically sensitive tasks: the administrative execution of nationalization.

The Anketa Filtration

My grandfather ‘dodged a bullet’. On 17 June 1940, my 56 year old grandfather stopped his bicycle on the side of the road in Baldone, Latvia, and watched the arrival of the Soviet military. He returned home to my grandmother and said: “I hope the Bolsheviks have changed since the Revolution.”

My grandfather was a Latvian national auditor in 1940. He knew the Bolsheviks from his decade living in Petrograd in 1912-1922. Born in 1884 on a ~2500-person Latvian farm colony: Zvaigznīte, next to Yeysk on the Sea of Azov, after a life in Moscow as a student with several additional years imprisoned for student riots, Grandfather was in Petrograd as a delegate in the Social Revolutionary political party, which split between June and October 1917, between the First All-Russian Congress of Soviets of Workers 'and Soldiers' Deputies meeting and the Second All-Russian meeting. Grandfather was on the split side which boycotted Lenin and the Bolsheviks in the October 1917 meeting. After a decade of a full Petrograd life, including front line WWI medical ambulances transporting the dead and wounded, and Grandfather’s first marriage, followed with his wife’s tragic death, Grandfather slipped across the border into free Latvia in 1922.

In those first weeks of USSR’s Occupation of Latvia in 1940, he must have become a chameleon in the Latvian organization that was instrumental to dismantling the State from within. The voting stamps in his passport demonstrates that he voted in July 1940 in the USSR fake election. Like all Latvians, he was threatened with death, if he did not vote [24], after voting inconsistently in free Latvia in 1928, 1929, 1931, and missing the intervening years.

When Grandfather was fired from the national auditors institution in September 1940, it was likely due to the fact that his institution was absorbed into the People's Commissariats of State Control, and they had no more need of his services. Not because of answers to the anketa questionnaire. If they had his full history, then he would have been arrested and worse.

 

Figure. Passport of my grandfather: Aleksandrs Graps with stamp of vote in 1940 Fake Election under duress. The Stamp shows the forced elections (July 14), when Latvian citizens voted for the Soviet puppet government with proof of a stamp in their passport, or they might be shot. [24]

 

My grandfather had not yet come to the attention of the Soviet authorities, which is my largest evidence that the Soviets were not organized and didn’t have all data sources on the Latvian citizens, collected and collated and in hand yet. Even in September-October 1940, with the required ~50 question, personnel questionnaire (anketa), people like my grandfather could still evade detection in the first year. Maybe his Petrograd experiences gave him the necessary skills. That I have Grandfather’s full Latvian military record from the 1920s with the Latvian government’s vetting, and his Petrograd information, shows that his data existed in 1940.

The standard, ~50 question Soviet personnel questionnaire (anketa) became widespread in September-October 1940 in the Baltic countries as a comprehensive filtration mechanism. Typical questions included:

• social origin

• parents' occupations

• property ownership

• political party membership

• military service

• foreign languages

• foreign travel

• relatives abroad

• previous employers

• arrests

• education

• religion

Data from the Anketa for each Baltic citizen was collected, evaluated and scored. Such scoring using NKVD repression categories was how the citizens of the Baltic countries in USSR’s two occupations: 1940-1, and 1945-1990, were filtered. Today, AI tools are good enough to evaluate a person’s history using the point-of-view of a 1940 NKVD officer. I entered my grandfather’s history from his vetted Latvian military record, along with additional notes from our family records to make an assessment of Grandfather’s 1940 Risk to the USSR. If you have your own Baltic family records, you can do the same. Ask your AI tool to provide: NKVD Category, NKVD High-Risk Group, Score and Risk Assessment. My grandfather’s history scored “NKVD Overall Operational Interest: 9.1 / 10”

An Approximate Reconstructed NKVD Recommendation (Autumn 1940) in English for my grandfather:

The subject belongs to the former administrative apparatus of the bourgeois Latvian Republic. His military and civil biography demonstrates prolonged service under institutions outside Soviet authority. His employment in the State Control institution afforded him detailed knowledge of state administration and finances. He should be removed from positions of state responsibility, subjected to cadre verification, registered for operational observation, and retained for further review should preventive security measures against former officials become necessary.

That he was not arrested and deported in 1940-1, is still a surprise to me. After Germany’s Occupation of Latvia began in the summer of 1941, Grandfather told our family that we were on a Deportation List, should the Red Army return. That was the driver for the Graps family to leave Latvia in October 1944. 

‘To Be Shot’

 

To be clear, the NKVD did not need reasons to arrest, imprison, deport and execute anyone in the Occupation of the Baltic countries. My grandfather was a clear risk to the USSR, but most other Baltic citizens were not. Here is part of a conversation from the Kersten Committee hearings (Part I, p. 105), between Committee counsel and Latvian witness Atis Grantskalns, when he describes a list with about 100 names that he saw taken out of a file cabinet in the NKVD ‘Corner House’ Riga prison office right after the Soviets left in June 1941 in a hurry when the Germans arrived. [15] The office had been occupied by Soviet prison guards, part of the NKVD, and the document bears the signature of Schustin, head of the People's Commissariat of National Security in Latvia. Written in the NKVD list, after the "reason for arrest" entry, there was a further notation meaning "To be shot." Kersten specifically asks whether any additional order was needed to carry out an execution beyond that notation, and Grantskalns’ answer was “no”. Further questions from the committee asked to give a concrete example of what someone's "crime" looked like, and Grantskalns read entry No. 45 aloud:

"Accused of hostility towards the Soviet regime. During an enemy air raid over Riga was found in a cemetery, violating military regulations. Committee decree provided by paragraph 58."

The full question and answer about the list starts on page 104 in the Report with the full list in Exhibit-7C in the back of the Kersten Report #1.  [15]

---

 ☕ Support this research     
Thank you for helping to disseminate Baltic lessons.

---

Stories from the National Auditor Records: The Facade of Normalcy and a Circus

• The auditors were presented as ordinary financial inspectors

• The inspections occurred before large-scale nationalization

• Existing management underneath the top tier was initially left in place

• Existing ministries continued functioning

Let’s begin with Robert Birk’s Expense Report.

Robert Birk’s Expense Report

Inside of a packet of accounts [26] for the Estonian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Liquidation Commission, dated 17 August 1940 to 31 December 1940, is one of the first stories encompassing about 20 separate expense items. We see details for paying to ship the household belongings of Estonia's former diplomats abroad back to Tallinn, meaning Estonia's foreign service was being formally wound down, its people's furniture and possessions literally being freighted home, while State Control, i.e. the national auditors, who didn’t exist independently any more, signed off on the bill.

The Expense report of Robert Birk, 2nd Secretary at the Estonian Legation in Berlin, serving under Minister Karl Tofer and Consul General Damasius Treude, documented Robert Birk’s repatriation to Estonia. He was essentially a former consulate staff being paid a Soviet salary for three weeks to pack up the Estonian consulate office in Berlin. In this set of remarkable archive records, institutions from three different political systems: USSR-captured-Estonia, the USSR, and Nazi Germany, were all cooperating routinely to wind down one small diplomatic post, weeks after that post's country, Estonia, stopped legally existing. Birk's final Expense Report [27], filed in Tallinn on 16 September 1940, itemized exactly where that money went, down to porters' tips and a taxi in Stettin, and shows the Estonian state, which no longer exists, now owes him RM 68.20. 

Nazi Germany's diplomatic and commercial infrastructure kept functioning normally too. A private German moving company, Schenker in Berlin [28], was not bothered by the fact that the country, whose diplomat they were moving, no longer existed as an independent country. Estonia's own Foreign Ministry, already dissolved in August 1940, was still listed on the paperwork as the entity paying the Schenker moving company bill. Schenker’s subsidiary in Tallinn was itself nationalized by the Soviet authorities one month later, right down to the letterhead, evident in a different shipment for someone else. [29]

Birk sailed home to Estonia on a ship named the M/S STALIN. He fled a dissolving diplomatic post, having spent three weeks employed by the very government that dissolved it, and crossed the Baltic on a vessel bearing the name of the man who ended his career. 

The documents here are just a few of the 20 or so expense items in the Birk’s subfolder of items for his Expense Report.

 

Figure. The 16 September 1940 Expense report of Robert Birk shows Expenses: Ticket on the M/S STALIN (red rectangle): RM 104.50, Ticket Berlin–Stettin: RM 10.90, Baggage cost Berlin–Tallinn: RM 1,025.80, Porters and taxi in Berlin, and Stettin: RM 15.-, Total: RM 1,156.20, Owed to him: RM 68.20. [27]

 

 

Figure. The August 20, 1940 bill from the moving company: Schenker, in Berlin, for Robert Birk’s materials shows Möbel 418 179 (furniture, reference number), "Re: household removal goods to Tallinn", Pickup from the Berlin apartment through to the departure steamer at Tallinn, including delivery of the required lift van, crates and packing material, provision of packers, loading, transfer to the railway, freight to Stettin, port fees, and sea freight to the Tallinn-bound steamer: 950 Reichsmarks, Tariff packing fee: 8 RM, Tariff metering fee: 5 RM, Insurance against general transport and sea damage risk (covering RM 5,000 of goods): 40 RM, Insurance against glass/porcelain/marble/mirror breakage (covering RM 500): 22.50 RM , S.V.S. and R.V.S. fees (standard shipping-insurance surcharges): 0.30 RM , Total: RM 1,025.80. Handwritten annotations at the bottom show partial payment tracking, "RM 1,025.80," a note about "88/100", and a signature for Schenker & Co. dated 27.8.40, suggesting the bill was settled within about a week of issue. [28]

The Nationalization of Eesti Pank

Behind nearly every one of these government accounts sat Eesti Pank, Estonia's central bank, which already in July of 1940, was compromised. Yet the "imitation of continuity" of these weeks was playing out in the bank records too. Eesti Pank was kept running July–September 1940, run by Soviet puppet Juhan Vaabel as Eesti Pank's "president," to continue the USSR's Estonian asset expropriation. The previous month, in July, Eesti Pank was ordered to hand its gold reserves in Sweden to the USSR State Bank, as we saw in an earlier NAFO Forum article [30] (the value, not the gold, was restored in 1992, see Part 2 [31]), and to extend the USSR State Bank a 10 million kroon interest-free credit (raised to 20 million by August 1940). Eesti Pank kept its name, its stationery, its Tallinn address, even its ordinary green-and-red printed forms, while it was already run by a Soviet-installed president, stripped of its onsite gold and safe-deposit-box valuables, which I'll describe in a future of this series, and forced to extend Moscow interest-free credit.

On October 10, 1940, Eesti Pank was formally nationalized. Its assets and liabilities were transferred to the USSR State Bank, its shareholders expropriated, and renamed the NSVL Riigipanga Eesti Vabariiklik Kontor (Estonian Republican Office of the USSR State Bank). Notice the timing: the gold, the credit, and the safe-deposit-box valuables were all taken in July and August, before the bank was formally dissolved. The work of the auditors liquidating every ministry, legation, and nationalized company still needed an outward-facing, functioning bank to process it all: to receive deposits, clear transfers, issue receipts, reconcile the master credit lines. Eesti Pank had to keep looking like Eesti Pank for as long as the liquidation itself needed it to. Only once that work no longer required the fiction, did the renaming happen. Several of Eesti Pank's own employees were later deported to Siberia; 74 workers in total were killed in the repressions, 28 of them dying in Gulag camps. [32]

 

 

Figure. (Tallinn, Sept 12, 1940) - Bank of Estonia. Normal letterhead addressed generically to "Välisministeerium, Admin.-juriid. Osakond” for a credit notice converting a $1,013.86 USD balance into 4,227.80 kroons Since the ministry was managing accounts across a dozen foreign missions simultaneously, a $1,013.86 transfer through the "Foreign Section" (Välisjaoskond) most plausibly reflects routine foreign-currency account management, moving a US dollar balance from one internal account into the ministry's running current account. It could originate from any of the dollar-denominated posts, New York, for example. [33]

 

Figure. (Narva, October 8, 1940) Receipt from the Eesti Panga Narva osakond (Narva Branch of the Bank of Estonia), addressed simply to "End. Välisministeeriumile" ("To the Former Ministry of Foreign Affairs"). The document records a state revenue payment of 6.03 kroons. For several more days before official nationalization, the Narva branch continued to use its pre-war institutional identity on official documents. The branch building itself was destroyed during the Soviet offensive that devastated Narva between March and July 1944, following the German occupation of Estonia (June 22, 1941–July 1944), which is a point I will return to, in a later section about Narva and Kremlin propaganda. [34]

 

Figure. (Tallinn, Oct 15, 1940) Identity Flipped. Госбанк СССР State Bank of the USSR, Estonian Republican Office "Extract from the report on collected and refunded state revenues, for the month of September 1940". Addressed simply to "End. Välisministeeriumile", "To the Former Foreign Ministry." Various budget-chapter line items totaling several thousand kroons in state revenue are listed using budget code references. The first column reads: Eelarve jaotused (ptk., §, lit.) Budget classifications (Chapter, Section, Letter). These refer to the 1938/1939 Estonian State Budget classification where IX XIII, etc. are budget chapters, and §2-a, §5, etc. are individual revenues lines. [35]

The Moscow ‘Circus’

On July 27, 1940, Estonia's Provisional Government, already a Soviet-installed body operating under Moscow's direction, recorded a decision in ‘protocol 89’ to authorize a delegation of the People's Representation, to travel to Moscow, for the occasion of Estonia's formal absorption into the USSR. [36]. An American Telegram recorded [37] before the event stated: 21 people were planned, while the Estonian archives shows the delegation was increased to 25, complete with the per diem amounts. [38]

The journey to Moscow was an integral part of the Soviet annexation spectacle. After the puppet parliaments in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia voted on 21 July 1940 to "request" admission into the Soviet Union, delegations from each republic were ceremonially dispatched to Moscow aboard specially organized trains.  These trains were part of the theatre with decorated stations, speeches, banners, and orchestrated crowds accompanying the journey. Similar scenes appeared in Latvian newsreel footage, see Jēkste's My Latvia, showing the Latvian delegation (07:36) [4], cheering crowds, and official ceremonies.These journeys transformed the railway into a mobile stage for Soviet propaganda, reinforcing the illusion that the Baltic people were enthusiastically celebrating their incorporation into the USSR. The theatrical nature of the event was further underscored by an Estonian National Archives caption referring to the delegation's return from Moscow "on Victory Day" (võidupäeval) [38], framing the annexation not as a constitutional procedure but as a political triumph. Rather than simple transportation, the train journeys formed a carefully choreographed component of the Soviet operation, linking the staged parliamentary votes, the Moscow ceremonies, and the triumphant train journeys of the delegations into a single, highly visible narrative of a supposedly voluntary union with the Soviet Union.

 

Figure. ERA.957.15.1, An expense summary (boxed section) for the ‘Victory Holiday Trip’. Three categories, all in rubles, converted to kroons at 80 Rbl = 7 kr: (1) Moscow delegation subsidy for the "victory-holiday" trip, Rbl. 1308.40 = kr. 1046.72 (dok. 33, 36–38, 40, 41, 45, 46, 52); (2) vehicles/apparatus for Tallinn commissariats, Rbl. 2175.85 = kr. 1740.68 (dok. 7, 8, 11–14, 17–20, 22, 47); (3) "Mitmed üldkulud" (various general expenses), Rbl. 1208.20 = kr. 966.64, including Prof. H. Kruus (dok. 21), Rbl. 900.—. Page total: Rbl. 8308.11 = kr. 6646.48. The backup ledger (following folio at the archive) shows Kruus's claim was originally Rbl. 1500.—, reduced ("moonstud") by 600 to the net 900 reflected here. See [38] reference item for full transcription.

 

Amongst the twenty-five in the Estonian delegation to Moscow, was Professor Hans Kruus, the historian, who would go on to serve as the Estonian SSR's own foreign minister. At the head of the group, was Johannes Lauristin, Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars, in effect, the prime minister of Soviet Estonia. [38

The unnamed man left holding the Estonian consular office in Moscow

While the ‘Victory’ delegation was making its way to Moscow to ‘celebrate’ the country's absorption, Estonia's actual diplomatic post in that same city, the Estonian Moscow consulate that had represented independent Estonia to the Soviet Union for two decades, was in the middle of falling apart from the inside.

According to a two-page handwritten letter in the Estonian archives, the unnamed man running the Estonian consulate in Moscow had not asked to run it. He had come to Moscow as an ordinary press attaché, expecting the routine work of a journalist attached to a diplomatic mission: cables, clippings, the occasional briefing. Instead, Foreign Minister Andresen telegraphed him directly and ordered him to take over the legation itself. [39][^a]

By the time the order reached him, there was very little legation left to take over. The legation had already been handed to the Soviet Commissariat of Foreign Affairs. The former staff, the people who had experience running the consulate, had been recalled to Tallinn, and on their way out they had taken every account book and administrative record with them. What remained was a balance sheet drawn up by an attaché named Maalberg, the cash sitting in the safe, the balance on the bank's current account, and whatever was in the safe-deposit boxes.[^a] Of the staff, only a caretaker and a driver stayed behind, and he had to manage the entire operation alone for two months. [39][^b]

He had never studied bookkeeping, and had never worked in the field. He says in the letter that Andresen must already have known that, when he gave the order, leaving him, in his own words, forced to act "bona fide," according to his own best judgment. [39][^c] He returned to Tallinn briefly during this period, where the former ministry's bookkeeper, Jakobson, told him his accounting didn't meet legal requirements and would not be recognized by the state auditors, particularly regarding the supplemental wages he'd been paying staff. [39][^d] He rejects that criticism outright: the old legation's payroll, he claimed, had been built on currency speculation the previous government had quietly permitted, in violation of Soviet law, and he banned it the moment he took over. [39][^e]

When Tallinn stopped sending salaries and food-supply funds for two months, he watched his housekeeper, paid 50 kroons a month, try to survive on that at the official exchange rate. He wrote to Tallinn about it repeatedly and got no answer or instruction back. He noted that the neighboring Latvian legation, whose staff salaries already ran almost 100 percent higher than Estonia's, had begun paying its own servants 30 rubles a day in food money. He started paying his own staff supplements out of necessity and his own judgment, taking nothing extra for himself. Even that, he admits, wasn't really enough; his servants still had to sell their own belongings to get by, and he didn't dare give them more Soviet currency than that, fearing it would later be scratched back from their wages at the official rate. [39][^f]

On page two of his letter, the unnamed Deputy Representative of the Estonian SSR (we don’t know his name) states that when Johannes Lauristin himself was physically in Moscow, (we don’t know the date, but it could have been for the ‘Victory celebrations’) he and Lauristin crossed paths. And there, verbally, the head of the entire Estonian SSR government told the man running the legation “to act at his own discretion.”

"Lõpuks andis Rahvakomissaride Nõukogu Esimees sms. Lauristin mulle Moskvas viibides suusõnal luba toimida oma äranägemise järele." [39][^g]

This sentence is, in its own way, the entire Soviet takeover of the Baltic states compressed into a single administrative moment: an institution stripped of its trained staff, its records, and its instructions, kept running by one person who had no qualification for the job, formally sanctioned not by any law, regulation, or written order, but by a shrug from the most powerful man in the room, delivered in passing, essentially to “wing it”. 

 

Figure. ERA.957.15.1, The second page of a two-page letter, Moskvas, 11.X.1940, from the unnamed "Eesti NSV esindaja asetäitja" (Deputy Representative of the Estonian SSR), a former legation press attaché who took over the Moscow office by telegraphed order from Foreign Minister Andresen, ran it alone for two months with no bookkeeping training, funded staff supplements out of pocket, and secured verbal authorization from Rahvakomissaride Nõukogu chairman Johannes Lauristin. Signature unidentified (title only). See ref. [39] for full transcription and paragraph-keyed notes. Notice that the original archived document already has markups in pencil, underling the most surprising facts as what I’ve written here, so I am not the first person since 1940 to flag this. 

Four Barrels

The reply with text in Russian from Riga arrived stamped in Latvian twice in red: Nacionālizēts uzņēmums. Nationalized enterprise. [40]As if one might not be believed the first time. Two signatures sat beneath it, a Soviet-appointed State Commissar's alongside the firm's original Technical Director's, Bencella, now speaking with two authoritative voices where it had before needed only one.

Yes, the letter confirmed  [41], four iron gasoline barrels had arrived in the autumn of 1939 "от тогдашнего Эстонского посланника Ребанэ", from the then-Estonian envoy Rebane, exactly as the Liquidation Commission had asked. But on the thirtieth of September, 1940, they had been swept into Bencella's own stock when the firm itself was nationalized. The barrels hadn't gone missing, or been sold, or misdelivered. They had simply stopped belonging to anyone.

Three weeks later, a second nationalized firm entered the archive file, this one on the Estonian side [42]. The First Estonian Oil Shale Industry, itself already nationalized once, under the old state, and now nationalized again under the new one, wrote back to the Commission in Estonian, flatly declining responsibility: "meil nõudmine otsekohe Teie vastu ja puudub meil igasugune alus vaatide tagasinõudmiseks mõnelt teiselt firmalt"; their claim ran directly against the ministry, they had no basis to chase any third party. The commission, they said, should take it up with "f-a Bencella komissarilt" and have the barrels shipped, once found, to the oil shale works at Kohtla-Järve.

Both letters trace back to one earlier document, and this is where the story sharpens. In November, the Commission had written not to a company, but to a man, Hans Rebane, once Estonia's foreign minister to Latvia, who had since retired to a summer house at Klooga. The letter did not ask him for help locating the barrels. It accused him of ordering them: "Teie ülesandel ja arvel korraldas end. Välisministeerium Teile 4 vaadi... Põlevkivitööstuse bensiini saatmist Riiga." On your instruction and at your expense, the former Ministry had arranged the shipment. Pay 300 kroons, it told him, or return the barrels yourself. [43]

Rebane's reply [44] survives in his own hand, and it opens by rejecting that premise outright. The gasoline, he wrote, had not been ordered on his own account: "mitte minu ülesandel ja arvel", but on the instruction of Foreign Minister Selter, who had directed him, while in Riga, to have the ministry order a quantity of state gasoline for the use of travelers passing through, at a time when Latvian petrol was scarce. He asked the Commission to retrieve his own original correspondence on the matter, so the record could speak for itself. And then, he offers that if Latvia's own "Rīgas Tirdzniecības un Rūpniecības" company still has contacts with Bencella, they might chase it faster than he can from retirement.

He signed it, simply, "Aupaklikult (Respectfully), Hans Rebane."

Sometimes history turns on surprisingly small objects. Four gasoline barrels linked the liquidation of the Estonian Foreign Ministry with the nationalization of a Latvian enterprise, exposing how Soviet authorities dismantled two independent states through remarkably routine administrative procedures. The barrels exposed how the two Sovietization processes directly overlapped. The bureaucratic language on both sides remained strikingly ordinary even as two sovereign states were being dissolved.

 

Figure. ERA.957.15.1, The first page of a two-page letter, written by Hans Rebane, dated 9 November 1940, to the Estonian Foreign Ministry Liquidation Commission concerning four barrels of gasoline. Rebane explains that the fuel had been purchased at Foreign Minister Karl Selter's instruction during wartime shortages for diplomatic use. The letter provides a rare glimpse into the meticulous bureaucracy surrounding the liquidation of the Estonian state after the Soviet occupation. [44]

The Destruction of Historic Narva and the Construction of a Soviet Narrative

Earlier in this article about the nationalization of Eesti Pank, I gave you a heads-up to another Narva story that would take place several years later. That story is about the destruction of the city itself. The destruction of historic Narva illustrates how Soviet authorities not only transformed political and administrative institutions but also sought to reshape historical memory. The physical destruction of one of Estonia's most significant historic cities was followed by a deliberate effort to reinterpret its causes, using documentary evidence collected by institutions, in this case, its own, to construct a narrative that served the political legitimacy of the Soviet post-war regime.

Research conducted by the Narva Museum demonstrates that the destruction of the city occurred in several stages during the Soviet offensive to retake Estonia. Massive Soviet air raids on 6–8 March 1944, followed by additional bombing on 17–19 March, devastated the historic city. Artillery bombardment during the final offensive culminated in the Red Army's capture of Narva on 26 July 1944, by which time approximately 95–98 percent of the pre-war city had been destroyed. Although retreating German forces carried out localized demolitions, the museum concludes that the overwhelming destruction resulted from Soviet aerial bombardment and artillery fire. [47]

Rather than acknowledging the principal causes of the destruction, Soviet authorities subsequently developed an alternative historical narrative. Historian Andres Toode demonstrates that documentation originally assembled by the 1942 State Commission for Assessing War Damages in Moscow was later repurposed as an instrument of political propaganda. Photographs, architectural surveys, damage assessments, and valuation reports were selectively reorganized into a multilingual photographic album that attributed the destruction of Narva primarily to retreating German forces. [49] [50]

 

Figure. Narva's Old Pharmacy before and after the 1944 Soviet bombing campaign. Left: The Old Pharmacy (Vana apteek), photographed in 1932, showing one of the prominent Baroque buildings on Narva's Town Hall Square. Right: The same building after the destruction of Narva during the Soviet air raids and fighting of 1944–1945. The comparison illustrates the near-complete destruction of Narva's historic Old Town, much of which had survived for centuries before being devastated during the final year of the Second World War. Images reproduced from the collections of Narva Museum. [48]

Toode argues that this represented a transformation of documentary evidence into political evidence. Administrative records intended to document wartime destruction were selectively employed to legitimize the Soviet narrative of “liberation” while obscuring the central role played by Soviet bombardment in the destruction of the historic city. The photographic album was an instrument for shaping domestic and international perceptions of responsibility for that destruction. [49][50]

Independent historical accounts likewise note that Narva's seventeenth-century Baroque Old Town possessed little military significance, raising questions about the military necessity of the extensive area bombardment that destroyed one of northern Europe's most important historic urban centers. [50]

The post-war treatment of Narva completed this transformation. Rather than reconstructing the historic city, Soviet authorities cleared many surviving ruins and replaced much of the old urban fabric with new Soviet development. The result was not only the destruction of a historic city but also the replacement of its physical and historical identity with a new narrative that portrayed Soviet forces exclusively as “liberators” while assigning responsibility for the city's devastation to the German occupiers. [49]

The Narva case therefore illustrates a broader mechanism that appears throughout this study. Under Soviet rule, any documentation could be reorganized and selectively interpreted to support political objectives. In Narva, administrative records of wartime destruction became instruments of narrative construction, demonstrating that the capture of administrative knowledge extended beyond governance to include the deliberate reshaping of historical memory itself.

The National Auditors and Political enforcement

The Soviet capture of the Baltic constitutional audit institutions served purposes that extended well beyond the administrative transfer of state finances and property. While auditors continued performing familiar professional functions: examining accounts, inventories, expenditures, and state assets, their work also possessed political value. Financial investigations conducted by established constitutional audit institutions carried an authority and credibility that could be utilized to support Soviet efforts to delegitimize the governments of the independent Baltic republics.

The clearest documentary evidence for this process comes from Lithuania. The scholarly history of the Lithuanian State Control [46], based on archival sources, concludes that the communist authorities sought to compromise the state, its political leaders and government officials (kompromituoti valstybę, jos politinius vadovus ir valstybės tarnautojus). On 30 July 1940, the People's Government ordered the reorganized State Control to investigate ministries and recover funds for alleged losses caused to the state. According to the authors, this objective was deliberately assigned to the existing State Control institution, which had already begun its reorganization along Soviet directives. State Control "found" those who had allegedly squandered state funds and supplied the information required by the new authorities, thereby participating in the political campaign to discredit the former Lithuanian Republic.

The campaign also targeted the institution's leadership. Former State Controller Konstantinas Šakenis was accused of failing to exercise proper oversight, permitting ministers to squander public funds, and concealing financial abuses.

The archival evidence from Latvia demonstrates a comparable institutional transformation. Auditors of Valsts kontrole were assigned to ministries and state institutions to inventory property, verify accounts, value state assets, inspect safe-deposit boxes, and prepare formal transfer protocols documenting the assumption of control by the Soviet authorities [23]. These records clearly establish that constitutional auditors became integral participants, willing or not, in the administrative execution of Sovietization. They also reveal the extensive financial knowledge generated through these investigations. Given the Lithuanian evidence and the comparable administrative role performed by Latvian auditors, this represents an avenue for further archival investigation. That is, to find a Latvian directive comparable to that found in Lithuania explicitly assigning auditors the political task of exposing alleged financial abuses in order to discredit the former Ulmanis government.

A similar situation existed in Estonia. The archival record [26] demonstrates the rapid capture and reorganization of Riigikontroll and the continuation of many outward administrative procedures under Soviet control. Whether Estonian auditors were likewise instructed to conduct politically motivated financial investigations comparable to those documented in Lithuania remains an open research question that warrants further examination of Estonian archival collections.

Viewed comparatively, the 1940 Baltic evidence suggests that the constitutional audit institutions possessed political value extending far beyond their constitutional responsibility for financial oversight. Their co-opted investigations carried the professional authority of a perceived independence to produce “findings” which were useful for Soviet propaganda against the former governments. 

Conclusion

The events described in this article unfolded with remarkable speed. Between the Soviet ultimatums of June 1940 and the formal incorporation of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania into the Soviet Union in August 1940, less than two months elapsed. By the time the Soviet Supreme Soviet voted to admit the three republics on 3–6 August 1940, much of the essential administrative work had already been completed. Puppet governments had been installed, state institutions reorganized, key economic sectors audited and prepared for nationalization, political opponents identified, and the administrative foundations of Soviet rule firmly established. The military occupation had opened the door, but the auditors, administrators, and political commissioners transformed that occupation into a functioning system of control.

Watching these events unfold, Acting U.S. Secretary of State Sumner Welles issued a statement [51] condemning "the devious processes by which the independence and integrity of these States were to be deliberately annihilated by one of their more powerful neighbors" and observing that those processes "have been rapidly drawing to a conclusion."

The Baltic experience of 1940 reminds us that the significance of auditors lies in how the scope of their authority can evolve. In the next article in this series, I examine developments during 2025–2026, from government efficiency programmes and scientific oversight to NATO restructuring, that invite reflection on the proper boundaries of auditing, institutional review, and democratic resilience. Readers familiar with the lessons of 1940 may recognize why these developments deserve careful attention.

 

---

The Baltic Gold Journey Stories by Amara Graps are a symbol of the Baltic countries’ prosperity in 1938, a large education in Russian-Soviet intelligence operations in 1939-1940, and a sign of hope, a half-century later in 1992-93. And just when you think that you have learned all of these lessons, the Gold points you to a few more lessons in 2008 and 2026.

Support Independent Baltic Research

Your contribution helps fund archival research and the publication of independent investigations, including:

The Journey of the Baltic Gold

• Part One, The Thefts
• Part Two, Restitution
• Part Three Deployment
• Part Four 6 mos to Totalitarianism

Other Archival Research

• The Kremlin's Useful Chaos: Troop Watch Data from 1992-4
• Case Studies (Handbook) of  the Hybrid War Tracker
• The Six Month Journey to a Free Press 

Future historical investigations

☕ Support this research

---

 

References

1. Karl Soonpää, "Karl Soonpää päevik 1939–1940." Akadeemia, no. 12 (1990): Tallinn: Kultuurileht. Digitized by the National Library of Estonia.[DIGAR] [1]

2. Karl Soonpää, "Karl Soonpää päevik 1939–1940." Akadeemia, no. 12 (1990):  Tallinn: Kultuurileht. Digitized by the National Library of Estonia.[DIGAR] [2]

3. Karl Soonpää, "Karl Soonpää päevik 1939–1940." Akadeemia, no. 12 (1990):  Tallinn: Kultuurileht. Digitized by the National Library of Estonia.[DIGAR] [3]

4. Albert Jekste, My Latvia. Documentary film. Presented by the United States Information Service. 18 min. Internet Archive. Accessed July 20, 2026. 1940. [Archive] [4]

5. The Wilmington Morning Star. "Baltic Countries Enter Red Union." (Wilmington, NC), July 22, 1940, p. 3. Library of Congress, Chronicling America. Library of Congress scan [5]

6. Jens Walter. Hitler–Stalin Pact "On This Day" series on X. A curated collection of daily historical posts documenting events related to the Molotov–Ribbentrop (Hitler–Stalin) Pact and the Soviet occupations of the Baltic countries and Eastern Europe. Accessed July 18, 2026. X search for the series [6]

7. Nijolė Maslauskienė, The Communist Party of Lithuania in 1939–1940 (International Commission for the Evaluation of the Crimes of the Nazi and Soviet Occupation Regimes in Lithuania). 2002. [PDF] [7]

8. Nijolė Maslauskienė, The Purge of Civil Servants in Soviet Occupied Lithuania between June–December 1940. Genocidas ir rezistencija, Vol. 2, No. 8 (2000), pp. 7–41. DOI: 10.61903/GR.2000.201. [VU] [8]

9. Helēna Emerberga, 2024. Latvijas Republikas valsts darbinieku atalgojumu risināšanas jautājums Valsts un pašvaldību darbinieku centrālajā savienībā (1918/1926–1934). Latvijas Universitātes Žurnāls. Vēsture 18: 52–73.[ResearchGate] [9]

10. Riigi Statistika Keskbüroo, Eesti arvudes 1920–1935 (Tallinn: Riigi Trükikoda, 1937), p. 14, cited in Tanel Pedaru, "1934. aasta riigipöörde mõju Eesti Kaitseliidule" (BA thesis, University of Tartu, 2011), p. 21, table 2. ~29,000 men were recorded in the "ühiskondlik tegevus" (public/social administration) occupational category in the 1934 census — 28,944, to be exact, 5.5% of all working-age Estonian men. [PDF] [10]

11. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3, images 319–322: Välisesindused. 1940/1941.a. eelarve. Available at: Cover (image 319), Budget page (image 320), Budget page (image 321), Budget page (image 322) [11]

12. Aleksandrs Drīzulis. Sociālistiskās revolūcijas uzvara Latvijā 1940. gadā. Rīga: Latvijas PSR Zinātņu akadēmija, 1963. 544 pp (Soviet-era propaganda publication portraying the 1940 Soviet occupation of Latvia as a "socialist revolution.") [ibook.lv] [12]

13. Guna Zariņa, Latvijas Valsts kontrole starpkaru periodā. Rīga: Latvijas Republikas Valsts kontrole, 2022. [Valsts] [13]

14. Valstybeskontrole. Development of the institution. The activities of the Lithuanian State Control as an independent institution were forcibly terminated on 26 August 1940. On 26 August 1940, in place of the abolished State Control, the People's Commissariat of State Control was established. I didn’t find yet precise decree dates for the same in Estonia and Latvia, but as the three countries were coordinated in nearly identical processes in their occupation, I assume the other two countries’ official state control liquidation was within one or two days of Lithuania’s. [valstybeskontrole] [14]

15. United States Congress. House of Representatives. Communist Takeover and Occupation of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania: Hearings Before the Select Committee to Investigate Communist Aggression and the Forced Incorporation of the Baltic States into the U.S.S.R. (Kersten Committee). Part I. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1954. Official chronologies, government records, and standard histories documenting the Soviet occupation of Estonia,, ,Latvia, Lithuania (15 June 1940), Latvia (17 June 1940), and Estonia (17 June 1940); the arrival of Soviet emissaries (Vladimir Dekanozov, Andrey Vyshinsky, and Andrei Zhdanov); and the installation of Soviet-controlled People's Governments between 17 and 21 June 1940. [KerstPDF] [15]

16. Lietuvos valstybės kontrolė. Lithuanian State Control: institutional transformation. Lietuvos valstybės kontrolės istorija. Vilnius: Valstybės kontrolė, 2015. Chapter IV, "Valdžios perimamumo imitacija ir sovietinės kontrolės sistemos diegimas 1940–1941 metais." This work provides the clearest published reconstruction of the political takeover of Lithuania's State Control institution, including the appointment of Liudas Adomauskas as State Controller, the Temporary Statute of July 1940, participation in Nationalization Commissions, and the institution's conversion into the Lithuanian SSR People's Commissariat of State Control on 25 August 1940. It serves as the principal narrative framework for the institutional transformation. [16]

17. Latvian National Archives (Latvijas Nacionālais arhīvs). Fonds of the Latvian State Control (Valsts kontrole) and the Latvian SSR People's Commissariat of State Control, including US1a, US2a, and related inventories (1940–1941). Latvian State Control archives: operational reconstruction. Archival inventories and records of the Latvian State Control and Latvian SSR People's Commissariat of State Control documenting personnel appointments and dismissals, enterprise audits, banking and financial inspections, inventories, balance sheets, transfer and acceptance acts, nationalization of enterprises, reporting to Soviet authorities, referrals to prosecutors, audits of the former President's Secretariat and presidential funds, and the progressive integration of State Control into the Soviet administrative system. [LV Valsts] [17]

18. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad. Estonian evidence from Riigikontroll and the Estonian SSR People's Commissariat of State Control, including ERA.R-941.1.14 (1940 Activity Report), ERA.R-941.1.30 (administrative and economic materials bridging the Republic and Soviet periods), ERA.R-941.1.1 (USSR decrees and instructions), and ERA.957.15.3 (Foreign Ministry Liquidation Commission records). These records document leadership replacement, institutional continuity, Soviet administrative integration, and participation in the liquidation of constitutional state institutions. [RA.ee] [18]

19. Soonpää, Karl. Diary entry, 16 June 1940.
    Published as "Karl Soonpää päevik 16. juunil 1940. aastal." ERR (Eesti Rahvusringhääling), 16 June 2020. Ed. Kaupo Meiel. [ERR] [19]

20. Soonpää, Karl. Diary entry, 17 June 1940.
    Published as "Karl Soonpää päevik 17. juunil 1940. aastal." ERR (Eesti Rahvusringhääling), 17 June 2020. Ed. Kaupo Meiel. [ERR] [20]

21. Soonpää, Karl. Diary entry, 21 June 1940.
    Published as "Karl Soonpää päevik 21. juunil 1940. aastal." ERR (Eesti Rahvusringhääling), 21 June 2020. Ed. Kaupo Meiel. [ERR] [21]

22. Soonpää, Karl. Diary entry, 22 June 1940.
    Published as "Karl Soonpää päevik 22. juunil 1940. aastal." ERR (Eesti Rahvusringhääling), 22 June 2020. Ed. Kaupo Meiel. [ERR] [22]

    Note on the series: All four are installments of an ERR editorial series titled "Karl Soonpää päevik 1939–1940," published on the 80th anniversary of each diary date (2020), presenting excerpts of Soonpää's diary,, he served as Estonia's Riigikontrolör (State Comptroller/Auditor General), alongside contextual commentary by historian Küllo Arjakas and accompanying period photographs and facsimile documents.

23. Latvijas Nacionālais arhīvs (LVA), 327. fonds, 1. apraksts, 455. lieta. 455 pages. For example, this report: LVA, 327. f., 1. apr., 455. l., 18. lpp. Ziņojums par seifu pārbaudi Daugavpils bankās ("Report on the inspection of safe-deposit boxes in Daugavpils banks"), dated 9 August 1940. "Pursuant to the order, on 4 August I travelled to Daugavpils to inspect the contents of the safe-deposit boxes in the banks and credit institutions of Daugavpils and Rēzekne…" and this report: LVA, 327. f., 1. apr., 455. l., 11.–11.a lpp. Ziņojums par seifu pārņemšanu Liepājā ("Report on the takeover of safe-deposit boxes in Liepāja"), dated 10 August 1940. Here is a mirror/reprint of the original three-part Latvijas Vēstnesis series by Jānis Riekstiņš (Latvijas Valsts arhīva vecākais referents) [23]

24. Time Magazine Monday, Aug. 19, 1940 "Those who failed to have their passports stamped for so voting may be shot in the back of the head."[Wayback Machine][Time] [24]

25. Eesti Vabariigi Rahandusministeerium. Eesti Vabariigi tulude ja kulude eelarve-ettepanek 1939/40. aastaks. Tallinn: Rahandusministeerium, 1939. Digitized by the Estonian National Library (DIGAR). [RiigikBudget] [25]

26. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3, images 1-328 in total: Välisesindused. 1940/1941.a. eelarve. Package of expenses for winding up the Foreign Ministries, begins here on image 1. [26]

27. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 16 September 1940 Expense Report of Robert Birk. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3 [Birk Expense Report] [27]

28. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3 [Schenker bill for transporting Birk's Materials] [28]

29. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3 26 September 1940 paperwork from Schenker in Tallinn, nationalized by the USSR. [Schenker Nationalized] [29]

30. Amara Graps 2025. "The Journey of the Baltic Gold: Part One, The Thefts." NAFO Forum, December 17, 2025.[NAFO Forum]. [30]

31. Amara Graps 2025. "The Journey of the Baltic Gold: Part Two, Restitution." NAFO Forum, December 30, 2025.. [NAFO Forum] [31]

32. Wikipedia contributors. "Eesti Pank." Wikipedia (Estonian). Accessed July 24, 2026.[WikiPank] [32]

33. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3 10 September 1940 Eesti Pank in Tallinn.[EestiPank] [33]

34. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3 08 October 1940 Eesti Pank reference in Narva.[EestiPank] [34]

35. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3 15 October 1940 Nationalized Eesti Pank in Tallinn. [EestiPank] [35]

36. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3 Estonian Delegation to Moscow, for ‘Victory celebration’ amended to 25 Undated referencing Sept 13, 1940. [MoscowDelegation] [36]

37. Foreign Relations of the United States, Diplomatic Papers, 1940, Vol. I, Telegram No. 101, The Chargé in Estonia (Leonard) to the Secretary of State, Tallinn, 24 July 1940. ("A delegation of 21 headed by Prime Minister Vares... will proceed to Moscow...") [History.gov] [37]

38. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3 Buried in this September expense summary for the "former Moscow legation" is:"Tagasisõidu delegatsiooonil Moskvast võiduspühal... Raamatud rahvakomissariaatidele Tallinnas... Prof. H. Kruus — 900.-" “On the return trip of the delegation from Moscow on Victory Day.” The next file in the sequence shows the 1500kr changed to 900kr. [KruusVictoryDay] [Kruus900kr] [38]

Here's the full transcription of the material inside the red rectangle (Figure in the text). Inside the red rectangle, there are three expense categories 1. Delegation subsidy for the Moscow trip “Toetust delegatsioonile Moskvas võidupüha puhul, dok. 33, 36–38, 40, 41, 45, 46, 52 = Rbl. 1308.40 ÷ 7/80 = kr. 1046.72 (a faint continuation word beneath, hard to make out — possibly "eest" / "arvel") Translation: "Subsidy to the delegation in Moscow for the victory-holiday occasion", now shown with its supporting document numbers and its ruble-to-kroon conversion. 2. Vehicles/apparatus for the commissariats “Aparaadid autoveo komissariaatidele Tallinnas, dok. 7, 8, 11–14, 17–20, 22, 47 =
Rbl. 2175.85 ÷ 7/80 = kr. 1740.68”. Below that sits a small reconciling sub-calculation (harder to read cleanly): a figure "1809.25" and "1447.—" with a running difference of "366.60" and "293.28" off to the side, these might be partial settlements or offsets against the main 2175.85 figure rather than a fresh line item. 3. "Mitmed üldkulud" (Various general expenses) — with three named sub-entries: V. Adamson, dok. 2 — Rbl. 30.— and kol. Linna, dok. 3 — Rbl. 278.30 and Prof. H. Kruus, dok. 21 — = 900.— with Subtotal: Rbl. 1208.20 ÷ 7/80 = kr. 966.64. Bottom grand total for the whole page: Rbl. 8308.11 ÷ 7/80 = kr. 6646.48. (underlined with a squiggle, marking the page/section total). The Kruus correction, confirmed by next file in the archive sequence is the itemized backup ("Mitmed asut. ja isikud" — Various institutions and persons) for that third category, and it shows the arithmetic behind the 900.— figure: Jrk. 21: ✓ ⊗ 1500.— + 900.— — Riigikontroll, prof. H. Kruus, with a footnote keyed to the ⊗ symbol at the bottom of the page:”⊗ moonstud Rbl. 600.—“ where "Moonstud" here reads as a deduction/annulment notation — i.e., 600 rubles was struck from an original 1500 ruble claim, leaving a net 900. To track the currencies, there are Rubles for the line items, kroons for the converted totals. Every individual figure in the itemized lists — the 30.—, 278.30, 900.—, the 1500.—/600.— is in rubles (Rbl.). That's the currency the Liquidation Commission was still working in for these entries, since they're settling accounts incurred under Soviet-controlled conditions. The kr. figures (1046.72, 1740.68, 966.64, and the page total 6646.48) are the kroon equivalents, produced by applying the "÷ 7/80" conversion to each ruble subtotal. So for Kruus specifically: his net claim was 900 rubles, which folds into the 1208.20-ruble subtotal for that "various expenses" category, which converts to 966.64 kroons as part of the page's overall 8308.11 Rbl → 6646.48 kr total. The 7/80 ratio itself is worth noting. The currency conversion was 80 rubles = 7 kroons, i.e. roughly 11.4 rubles per kroon, to know how the occupation authorities were pricing the ruble against the kroon in these liquidation-era conversions. On the subsequent archive file with Kruus’ 900 Rb correction, we see prof. P. Ruubel (likely Peeter Ruubel, another Estonian Soviet-era academic/official) and names Lauristin, Kerdo, Botškarov grouped together

39. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3 The two page letter from the unnamed "Eesti NSV esindaja asetäitja" which is the "Deputy Representative of the Estonian SSR". We don’t know the name of the person who wrote the letter, as his signature is a person signature and he provides only a title: Deputy Representative of the Estonian SSR. His signature starts with what looks like a tall capital letter (possibly J, S, or F, the ascender shape is ambiguous at this resolution), followed by a series of connected, fairly compressed loops suggesting a multi-syllable surname, and ends with a short descending flourish. After his signature stroke sitting directly above the typed title line "/Eesti NSV esindaja asetäitja/" is "Deputy Representative of the Estonian SSR".Since it is a significant personal perspective of the on-the-ground situation for managing a foreign consulate in the period of absorption in the USSR and from the core city orchestrating the absorption, I’ve broken down this unnamed person’s letter into the relevant quotes. [MoscowConsulate] two pages: [MoscowConsulate1] [MoscowConsulate2]. Notice that the original archived document already has markups in pencil, noting the most surprising facts as what I’ve written here, so I am not the first since 1940 to flag this. [39]

[^a]: p. 1, paras. opening "Soitsin Moskvasse presseatasheena..." and "Siis aga tegi valisminister sms. Andresen..." — original posting as press attache while the former legation was still operating; Andresen's telegraphed order to take over the legation; the archive's transfer to the Soviet Commissariat of Foreign Affairs; the recalled staff taking the account books with them; the balance sheet left by attache Maalberg; what he inherited (cash on hand, current account, safe deposits).

[^b]: p. 1, para. opening "Saatkonnateenijaist jaid kohale..." — only the caretaker and driver remained; two months running the office alone.

[^c]: p. 1,, para. opening "Mina ei ole kunagi oppinud raamatupidamist..." — no bookkeeping training or experience; Andresen knew this when giving the order; acting "bona fide" on his own judgment as a result.

[^d]: p. 1, para. opening "Minu Tallinnas viibimisel nadal tagasi..." — during a Tallinn visit about a week before writing, former ministry bookkeeper "kodanik Jakobson" told him his accounting didn't meet legal requirements and would not be recognized by the state auditors, particularly regarding servant pay supplements.

[^e]: p. 1, para. opening "Mina ei saa niisugust seisukohta..." — his rebuttal: the former legation's payroll and finances had been built, with the old government's consent, on currency speculation in violation of USSR law, which he banned immediately upon taking over.

[^f]: p. 1 (continuing across the page break) through p. 56, paras. ending "...elada" and following — two months with no salary or food-supply funds from Tallinn; the housekeeper (50 kr/month) unable to live on that at the official exchange rate; repeated unanswered letters to Tallinn; the neighboring Latvian legation's salaries running nearly 100 percent higher than Estonia's, with servants there paid 30 rubles/day in food money; his own supplemental payments (100 rubles the first month, 300 the second, per person), taking none for himself; staff still having to sell personal belongings despite the supplements; his reluctance to accept more Soviet currency for fear it would later be deducted from wages at the official rate.

[^g]: p. 2, para. "Lopuks andis Rahvakomissaride Noukogu Esimees sms. Lauristin..." — the quoted verbal authorization from Johannes Lauristin, given while he was in Moscow.

[^h] Two further passages from the same letter, p. 2, para. "Mis puutub raamatute ostmise arvetesse..." describes book-purchase orders relayed from Tallinn by letter/telegraph, local bookshops' lack of itemized receipts, and his own description of single-handedly filling every role "from doorman to tourist guide to official representative," with no way to independently verify his own lawfulness since the former staff took all prior records and budgets with them on departure. The closing paragraph, "Neid asjaolusid arvesse votte...," is his formal request that the cashbook he kept with the driver's help be accepted as correct given the extraordinary circumstances, noting that regular bookkeeping will now resume under a new bookkeeper, comrade Ouna. The letter is signed "Moskvas, 11.X.40 / Eesti NSV esindaja asetaitja."

40. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3. Bencella (Rīga, signed by the Valsts komisārs and Technical Director A. Sosnovskis) to Liquidation Commission of the former Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 19 Dec. 1940 (Russian). RA, ERA.957.15.3. [Bencella1] [40]

41. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3. Liquidation Commission → Bencella, Riga, 4 December 1940 (00300, Russian) Signed "О.Грант" (O. Grant). Key line: "В октябре месяце 1939 года Эстонским Сланцевым Производством были отправлены в Ригу на имя тогдашнего посланника Эстонской Республики Х.Ребане 4 бочки бензина, которые по соглашению с последним были переданы в Ваш склад." “In October 1939, the Estonian Oil Shale Production sent 4 barrels of gasoline to Riga, addressed to the then-envoy H. Rebane, which by agreement with him were placed in Bencella's warehouse. Asks whether the barrels are still there, or where they were sent; asks that if still held, they be forwarded via a trading company in Valga for return to the Oil Shale Industry.” [Bencella2][41]

42. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3. "Esimene Eesti Põlevkivitööstus" (First Estonian Oil Shale Industry , itself explicitly marked "Endine Riigi Põlevkivitööstus", i.e. formerly the State Oil Shale Industry, so already nationalized) writes to the Liquidation Commission on Dec 24, 1940, explaining that they'd sold gasoline to the ministry and loaned it barrels ("vaadid") on credit back when it existed, so they have no claim against any third party for the missing barrels; the ministry needs to chase them down. They specifically ask the commission to pursue "f-a Bencella komissarilt", a commissar at a firm called Bencella , for return of the barrels, to be shipped to the Kohtla-Järve oil shale mine address. [Bencella3] [42]

43. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3. The Liquidation Commission's original letter is addressed to Hans Rebane personally, not at a legation, but at "Klooga suvituskoht, Omas majas" (Klooga summer resort, his own house), informing him the barrels were his personal responsibility and demanding he pay 300 kr (4 barrels at an inflated 75 kr each) if they can't be recovered. [Bencella4] [43]

44. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3. Rebane explains he never personally ordered the gasoline, a prior Foreign Minister, Selter, had instructed him to have it purchased at the legation's expense during a wartime petrol shortage, since diplomatic vehicles needed fuel and general supply was tight. He insists he's not the one who initiated the purchase, asks the commission to pursue Bencella directly instead, and, offers that if Latvia's own "Rīgas Tirdzniecības un Rūpniecības" company still has contacts with Bencella, they might chase it faster than he can from retirement. Note: this letter is handwritten cursive Estonian with some water damage; the phrase "mitte minu ülesandel ja arvel" is transcribed with reasonable confidence, but several surrounding clauses (the precise wording around Selter's instructions and the Valga firm's name) remain a best-effort reading rather than a certain transcription and would benefit from a second pass or independent verification against the original. file: 297 [Rebane_page1] file: 298 [Rebane_page2] [44]

45. National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv). RA, ERA.957.15.3. Välisministeeriumi likvideerimise komisjoni ärakirjad.. 17 August–31 December 1940. Source: National Archives of Estonia (Rahvusarhiiv), RA, ERA.957.15.3 No date. Top left: "End." with a handwritten reference number below it, "№ 848-cl." (or similar — the suffix is still a bit ambiguous in the handwriting). Top right: a handwritten "292" , this is the foliation/page number added by the archive (or a later processing stamp). A formal request to the ENSV Council of People's Commissars to confirm the following appointees for liquidating the former Estonian Foreign Ministry: Chairman: O. Samma, former Deputy Foreign Minister. Members: O. A. Grant (former head of the General & Consular Bureau / Administrative Department deputy) and O. Jädari (former Economic Director-Chief Bookkeeper). Support staff: M. Haavamaa (records/passport clerk), A. Simmado and O. Russin (bookkeepers), and, typist G. Lauristin. G. Lauristin working as the commission's typist is very likely a relative of Johannes Lauristin, the Council of People's Commissars Chairman who personally gave the Moscow deputy "verbal permission to act at his own discretion". If it's his daughter, wife, or another close relative, that's a notable detail: the head of the entire Soviet Estonian government's family member sitting inside the very commission liquidating the government it replaced. Worth verifying. [LiquidatingFM] [LiquidatingFM] [45]

46. Dalia Bukelevičiūtė, Ryšard Gaidis, Algirdas Jakubčionis, Saulius Kaubrys, and Ramunė Šmigelskytė-Stukienė. Lietuvos valstybės kontrolės istorija. History of Lithuanian state control.Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 2015. 525 pages. [Valstybes] [46]

47. Narva Museum. Narva '44. Exhibition marking the 80th anniversary of the March 1944 bombing of Narva. Narva Museum, 2024. [NarvaMuseum] [47]

48. Narva Museum (Narva Museum). Narva 44. Narva: Narva Museum, 2024. PDF. [NarvaMuseumdoc] [48]

49. The Dark Atlas. "Narva, Estonia: Russian Border City, Dark History Uncovered." [DarkAtlas] [49]

50. Toode, Andres. "Valuable War Ruins: Assessing War Damages to Architectural Heritage, Using the Example of Narva." Vana Tallinn 31 (35). Tallinn: Tallinn City Archives, 2022. [Propastop] [50]

51. "U.S. Denounces Soviet Moves in Baltic." News (Adelaide, SA), July 24, 1940. National Library of Australia, Trove. Hat-tip to Jens Walter in his extensive news article retrievals (see Ref. 6) for digging up this one [Trove] [51]